Get Him to the Greek

As I become older, the less and less I enjoy comedies at the movies. For some reason, the big screen seems like a showcase for action and drama, while the small screen seems suited for comedy in half hour segments. This isn’t without its exceptions; I thought the Hangover was great. So going into Get Him to the Greek I was a bit skeptical. However, I did enjoy the movie.

The movie depends on the physical and awkward humor of Jonah Hill and the over the top performances from Russell Brand and Sean Combs. All of them seem perfectly cast in their roles. Hill seems to spew physical, awkward humor while also giving a little heart. Brand naturally seems like a strung out rock star. Both of their characters back stories’ attempt to make them more human. I’m not sure if it works in the end and I didn’t really feel for either of the characters. The movie benefits from the action and problems Hill has in dragging Russell to each appearance. Hill’s problems provide plenty of humorous moments. The physical humor and jokes at Hill’s expense could get tiresome, and nearly does, but Combs brings fresh energy near the end to push the movie to its conclusion. The end of the movie tries to give the characters heart, but it seems a little too awkward and rushed. Overall, it's a decent movie that I’m glad I saw, but don’t know if I’ll be seeing again.

NBA Finals

At the beginning of the series, I had thought the Boston, despite having a less than impressive regular season, but a brilliant playoff run would have the edge. I thought that the Lakers would have difficulty defending guards Ray Allen and Rajon Rondo. Either Derek Fisher or Kobe Bryant would be matched up against them. Derek Fisher seemed overmatched and Kobe, I thought, would be worn out having to chase around Rondo or fighting through screens guarding Allen. I thought Paul Pierce on Ron Artest and Kevin Garnett on Paul Gasol would be interesting matchups.

Now with the series at 3-3, the series and the NBA season comes down to one game. Thus far Kobe Bryant has been the MVP. If the Lakers lose on Thursday and Kobe receives the MVP award, which he deserves, he will be the second player ever to win the MVP after Jerry West in 1969 (Boston fittingly beat the Celtics 4-3). Kobe showed why he deserves the MVP in Game 6. He scored 26 pts (he has scored more than 20 pts every game) and was active all game. He brought energy by jumping after loose balls and playing an active role on defense.

The series is not as I expected it. As I wrote before, I thought the guard play would favor the Celtics, but Kobe has played well all series and Derek Fisher was big in the 4^th quarter of Game 3. Both Rondo and Allen have played below expectations. Allen was huge in Game 2 (8-11 3pt and 32 pts) but has been very pedestrian otherwise. Rondo similarly had a great Game 2 (19 pts, 10 ast, 12 reb), but has also very pedestrian in the rest of the series. The Celtics have held the Lakers down with good defense and vice versa. In Game 5, the Celtics forced Kobe to be a one man show, which is what they will have to do the win the series. Boston’s most consistent performers have been Pierce and Garnett, who has hit some key shots and has looked good since the series moved to Boston. The Lakers defense of Rondo looks laughable, but it works. They are begging him to take a jump shot. Kobe and other defenders are giving him 3 to 4 feet of space. Rondo has to get a jump shot in the off season or he should expect this type of defense all season. Teams used to play Derrick Rose this way until he convinced them that his jumper can be equally as deadly.

I give the edge in Game 7 to the Lakers only because of home court advantage, but in my mind it is a toss-up. As the commercials said, “legacies are at stake”. I’m sure Kobe will show up the question is who will for the Celtics? They can’t have another performance where they score 67 points (Game 6). Give credit to the Lakers for being up to the task of shutting down a Celtic team that has multiple weapons.

Stargate Universe Season 1

Looking back at Season 1, I am excited about the promise and progress of the show. This is not like former Stargate series. It’s darker, less action, more drama, more conflict, and less friends. I’m a fan of the series. The best part of the series is the Col. Young and Dr. Rush. It’s extremely interesting to see their characters develop and interact violently at times. Although the show sometimes falls into the trap of dealing with one Armageddon-like catastrophe each week, conflicts and past disagreements are often carried over throughout the series.

It seemed early on that the show was using a bunch of devices to carry the story and build characters (kino and communication stones), but they have drifted a bit away from that (well the kino-storytime parts at least). I think it was probably necessary to build up some of the characters. One thing I do enjoy is no aliens. Although there was the attack on the ship, the aliens did not dominate the storyline and the drama was more built on the characters reacting to the situation rather than aliens being equal in importance.

The series, like any other, isn’t without its faults. The show has a cast of thousand, not literally, but there are a lot of characters and a lot of storylines that just die or are never seen again. (For example, what about the civilian leader on earth telling Camille Wray to take control on board? Or what about Lt. Scott’s feud at the end the season) These might be little seeds for future seasons, but the some of the characters still suffer from underdevelopment. (For instance, Camille Wray) Rush and Young are much stronger characters and she is usually the one complaining while Rush and Young drive the action. This might be interesting to watch down the line, but too many times we see one episode designed to explore a character’s past and then don’t really explore it further. Maybe it helps build background, but there are too many characters to do that with and the focus is sometimes lost. There is no intense, intimate relationship we have with the characters like in Dexter.

The season ended with a storyline built over the last few episodes about the Lucian Alliance using Dr. Rush in Col. Telford’s body (who had been brainwashed) to dial the 9^th chevron and boarding the ship. I think it was the best part of the season. It was interesting and exciting to see the crew deal with this new threat with their underlying conflicts present. If the season has shown anything, it shows that while Wray, Rush, and Young don't get along normally, they will work together against a common enemy, or problem. I thought there could have been a little more action and intrigue (like The Negotiator), but I was still excited to see each episode. The rays potentially killing everyone aboard also was a nice wild card thrown into the mix. I was also extremely pleased to see Col. Young’s notion that he can save everyone go down. I felt that was the downfall of the previous Stargates. There was always a way to bring back a character and they never left anyone behind even if it meant a bigger disaster unfolding. Col. Young knows he cannot save all the hostages held by the Alliance, but still is determined to (and if he could I would have lost respect for the series.) and it is interesting, but not surprising that Rush is the one to tell him it.

The really disappointing part of the season was that it didn’t end. The mid season ending had more of a finale feel. I understand the attraction for a cliffhanger, but it’s like they just forgot to show the last 10 minutes. Nothing was resolved just pushed until next season. I much rather prefer the way Chuck did it this season (unveiling a new storyline) or Dexter did it. (I won’t say again how expert it was to finish the season that way.) They both finished a major storyline, but made you want to continue next season. So now I feel obligated to watch the first episode, not that I wouldn’t have anyways. Despite my disappointment, I still am looking forward to see what they have planned for next season after they finish this one.

Basketball thoughts

This week has been a bit hectic so I'll make it short and sweet this week. My two basketball teams, the Illini and the Bulls find themselves at a crossroads to the postseason.

Illini
I went to the Minnesota game on Saturday and it was pretty ugly in the 1st half. I was just hoping we'd make it into double digits in the first half. The second half was pretty exciting. I have never seen a comeback before and every 3 made was incredible. Even though the Illini lost it was a good game to experience, but it was my first loss at Assembly Hall. Because of this loss and the loss last night against Ohio State, I think to be safe for the tournament, the Illini need to win at home versus Wisconsin and win at least one Big Ten tournament game. If they lose against Wisconsin, they might need to get to the Big Ten Championship game to prove their worth. The problem is inconsistency which has plagued them all season. This is true not only from game to game, but half to half. Bad early losses to Utah and Bradley. Good wins at Wisconsin and Clemson and versus Michigan State.

Bulls
The Bulls came out of the break with a good string of wins against less than stellar teams (T'wolves, Knicks, Pacers, Sixers), but are hobbling now. In yesterday's practice, Rose, Hinrich, Noah, Miller, and Deng all sat. Noah and Deng sat out in the Atlanta loss. The problem with the Bulls is that they are facing a long stretch without Noah and nagging injuries on your starters. The trades have left the Bulls with a lack of big men although they recently just resigned Chris Richard for the rest of the season. Besides Richard, your looking at an hobbling Noah, a aging Miller who can't put extended minutes, Taj a rookie also with a foot injury, and Hakim Warrick. The Bulls are also about to hit a rough stretch of playing some good teams (Dallas, Utah, Orlando, Cleveland). Right now they are 2 games up on the 9th place Bobcats.

Despite all the recent injury news, I thought the trades were pretty good. Warrick and Murray seem to fit well and the Bulls seemed to be running the break more. Additionally, the Bulls cleared space for a potential free agent. I think they struck the best balance they could by competing this year and still trying to land a free agent. Warrick seems like a more reliable Tyrus who plays with energy and runs the floor. Murray also runs the floor nicely and has some nice offensive moves.

Avatar

I was debating whether to do a Bulls/Illini post or an Avatar post because I saw the movie on Friday night. I went with Avatar, but a basketball post may be in the near future. Anyway, I saw Avatar in 3D last Friday. I know its been out a while, but I really don't see too many movies anymore. I should start from the beginning. When I first saw previews for this film a while back I thought, "This is going to be horrible." When I heard how much it cost to make I said, "This is going to be a disaster." I wasn't really interested until I heard how much money the movie continued to make so naturally I had to see what all the fuss was about. Standard spoiler warning applies.

• 3D Glasses. So this is the first, non-Disney park movie I've seen in 3D. I had a little problem with viewing it at first. It kinda strained my eyes for the first half hour. I really took me out of the movie, because I couldn't really get comfortable. I eventually got used to the glasses even if they were a bit over sized and would occasionally fall down my nose. I'd like to see it again without 3D to see the difference.
  
• Storyline. The storyline was a bit predictable. From the moment, you see Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and the Navi you realize there's going to be a Pocahontas/Dances with Wolves theme developing here. You also get a bit of a Last Samurai feel the way Neytiri (Zoe Saldana) teaches Jake how to be a Navi and train like them, which results in Jake leading them against the enemies with the advanced technology which he is familiar with. The movie doesn't seem to dwell too long and Jake's decision to accept Navi culture. From the start he is curious about it, so it seems as though the movie accepts that you must know the building theme. The only real suspense storywise happens near the end of the movie. I was curious to see how dark James Cameron would take the story. Would Jake lead the Navi over the humans and their profit driven ways, or would the machines of industry continue to destroy the nature world and rid it of its wonder? Well Cameron chose the safe side and lead the hero to victory, but I wonder if the movie would have held more meaning or if it would have been too moral or preachy they other way.
  
• Graphics/Visuals. The visuals were very impressive it the way that you accept the environment. I sat there watching the film and about 30 minutes after arriving on Pandora I realize that I'm not looking at anything real. This planet it fake. Its plants are not real. The Navi are CGI. The ground does not light up under their feet. I think that's a real credit to the movie that the visuals are so impressive you forget its computer generated. I remember watching the Matrix Reloaded and seeing the scene where Neo fights the Agents Smith in the courtyard between two buildings. The graphics were obviously trying to mix CGI shots with live action. The CGI was apparent and it took you out of the moment. Avatar was different.
  
• Empathy. I also liked the movie, because of the empathy Cameron creates with the Navi. They are these large, blue human-like beings who dwell in a large tree. Besides the obvious underdog status, if done wrong, the audience could be made to not care about these beings at all. But you get a sense for their way of life and how they think they are smarter than the "Sky people" because the Sky people don't understand certain things about life and nature.
• Negatives. One thing I though was very annoying was the name unobtainium. Really? Unobtainium? I almost laughed when I heard it. Sounds like something they would make up on a children's cartoon. I also didn't understand the character of Parker Selfridge (Giovanni Ribisi). I understand he's like the on site company executive who seems to have a conscious, but still driven by profit. He also seems vindictive too when Jake and Grace (Sigourney Weaver) fail to evacuate the Navi from the tree. I guess he's there to show the business side as opposed to the Science side (Weaver) and the miltary side (Stephen Lang as Col. Quaritch). Maybe I'm nitpicking but the character didn't seem very consistent. Another nitpicky thing was the names of the Navi. Now this ends up not really mattering, but I couldn't tell you the name of any of the Navi without looking it up. Its harder to remember unfamiliar names without a memory device.
  
• Connectivity. This is the part of the movie I enjoyed the most. The contrast between the humans and the Navi. The humans get in large armored vehicles which they control. The Navi use organic connections to control flying and horse like animals. Humans enter in data in computers and other informational networks to keep track of it. The Navi are connected to the past and their surroundings by an organic network of trees and electrical impulses that connects the environment. It's kinda of a science fiction way of looking at Native American view of the connectivity of all lifeforms. All of that said without central aspect of the film, the Avatar. Now Avatar, the movie, really ignores the moral implications of growing a lifeform to take it over. This is something which probably distracts from what Cameron was trying to achieve, but what I think is a very unexplored side. Do the Avatars have thoughts besides what the humans think? Do the Avatars dream? Is there no consciousness in the Avatar? Is it right to grow a being just to use it essential as a tool? Once again, very unexplored but not the aim of the movie.

The movie is definitely worth a look and far surpassed my very low bar for it. If nothing else it is visually stunning and crafts enough depth to make it a good movie.

• 
  

Psych

Over the past weekend, I was able to catch up on a few shows. I have to admit I've started to follow the USA weekday line up of Psych, White Collar, and Burn Notice. USA shows are in general an hour long and some combination of action, comedy, and a little drama. Psych is pretty light on the drama, but heavy in comedy with a little action. The show is in its 4th season. I started watching at the end of last season. The show is based around Shawn (James Roday) and Gus (Dule Hill) who run a psychic detective agency. Of course, Shawn is really not psychic, just really observant. They are regularly hired by the police to solve crimes, thus their involvement with most of the other main characters

The show is pretty formulaic with each hour revealing a mystery and solving it. The reason to watch the show isn't exactly for the drama or the deep characters. The show is successful due to the comedic exchanges between Shawn and Gus. Shawn also has funny exchanges with his dad (Corbin Bernsen) and Det. Lassiter (Timothy Omundson). Juliet (Maggie Lawson) is there to as a romantic attraction for Shawn, as well as to balance out the overly straight-laced Lassiter. The plot of each show is mildly interesting as the viewer often is guessing, along with Shawn and Gus what the answer is to the unsolved questions.

From my limited viewing of the show, I think Psych is a good balance of humor and action. Don't expect things to get that deep or last longer than the hour it takes to watch the show. This was particularly apparent as Juliet makes a difficult decision with her brother in one episode, yet seems completely unaffected by it in the next episode. The only thing that seems to bridge episodes are the love connections. However, if you want to be entertained for an hour Psych is a good show to sit back, let the TV take over and watch.

Super Bowl thoughts

Well, I wish this was a post about the Bears, but the closest we got was a commercial redoing the '85 Bears shuffle. Anyway, this game was built up to be a battle of the QBs, Peyton vs. Brees, and it was. Many predicted that Indy would cruise to a victory. I didn't think so I thought that the Saints had a good shot at this game. The Colts seemed too often to be digging themselves out of a hole and although they may have missed a perfect season by one half of Peyton sitting on the bench, they never seemed to have the domination factor the Patriots did a couple season ago. But they had Peyton and a slew of unheralded, impressive receivers, similar to the Saints. Speaking of the Saints, I knew that Drew Brees was good for my fantasy team. I was impressed by how Brees could spread the ball out to so many receivers. I liked the toughness of Pierre Thomas, although I have some U of I bias. I also thought both teams defenses were underrated due to their strong offenses.

Dual of QBs Fates. This was a battle of the QBs in my mind. They combined for a Super bowl record 63 completions. Brees, the MVP, was an impressive 32 for 39 going 288 yards with 2 TD. Meanwhile, Peyton was 31 for 45 going 333 yards with 1 TD and 1 interception. Those may seem like ordinary numbers for those two QBs in a regular season game, but both QBs took what was given to them. Both either had a lot of time to throw of was able to locate a check down. Both teams passed about 70% of time (IND: 45 passes in 64 plays NO: 39 passes in 57 plays). The crucial stat was there was only 1 turnover. As the game progressed, I felt that which ever team made a mistake first was going to lose. In this case, Brees and the Saints stood firm while Peyton and the Colts blinked.

Saints outplayed Colts in all but 1st quarter. The Colts owned the 1st quarter, but the rest of the game was won by the Saints, starting with two Garrett Hartley field goals in the second, the onside kick to start the half in the third, and the Tracy Porter interception in the fourth.

Gutsy calls by Payton. Sean Payton made some gutsy calls in this game. Two that immediately come to mind are going for it on 4th down and goal near the end of the 1st half and of course the onside kick to start the 2nd half. Payton was definitely seemed like he was going to take the risks to try and get the reward. Luckily for him it worked. If the onside had not worked, the decision to go for it and give Peyton Manning the ball on his own 40 would have definitely been questioned. Especially after the Saints had just worked their way to a 10-6 margin.

Content to take whats underneath. Too many, the game seemed a little lackluster for such a close game. I think this is because of the way both teams approached each other. Both teams were afraid of a total aerial assault, so they were willing to give up the short plays. As a result there didn't seem to be too many huge plays for large gains. It was methodical drives down the field with each team gaining just enough to advance the ball.

Garrett Hartley, Pierre Thomas, and Joseph Addai. An impressive day for Garrett Hartley easily kicking field goals of 46, 44, and 47 yard, the first kicker to kick 3 40+ field goals in a Super bowl. Hartley not only put the ball right down the center, he kept the Saints from sliding out of the game in the early going, bring the halftime score to a 10-6 match. Although Pierre Thomas only went 9 carries for 30 yards and a TD, he was hard to bring down and was very impressive in his one TD. Ditto of Joseph Addai who bested Thomas with 13 carries for 77 yards and 1 TD. I was impressed at how Addai exploded through the hole. He also had 7 receptions for 58 yards.

2010 November Notion

Dexter Finale

So finally a Dexter post. The season's only been over for half a year. Michael C. Hall and John Lithgow have already won Golden Globes. Anyway, this year's Dexter finale was intriguing. It wasn't has anticipated as the Season Two ending, but I was interested how they would tie everything together. There are a couple codes the show lives by: Whoever finds out who Dexter truly is killed (his brother, Lila, Doakes, Jimmy Smits) and Dexter always why he should follow Harry's code and pays the price for straying. It was clear in the finale that the Trinity killer (John Lithgow) was going to be killed. I thought that Deb would find out as well. What was unclear to me was how was Dexter going to pay the price for straying from Harry's code. Throughout the season, Dexter had grown to accept his role in his new family. It almost seemed as if he had outgrown the code. Gone from the latter half of this season was the incessant urge to kill. Could Dexter truly outgrow his nature? Spoiler alert.

Of course he couldn't. The writers definitely delivered in the finale. They took care of the obligatory killing of the Trinity Killer. As I was watching, I was thinking this is a very average and mundane ended for Dexter. It seemed like it could have been the ending to any episode. Then I looked at the time. There seemed too much time left and that's were the excitement really kicked in. What could happen in a few minutes? Is it going to fit in with the plot? Is it going to be out of the blue? Is Deb going to confront him? Then the reveal that Rita was killed, presumably by the Trinity killer, truly shocked me. At first, I didn't like it. I thought this is horrible how could they just unexpectedly kill her.

The more I thought about it the greater I thought the ending was. The whole season was how Dexter was growing into this suburban role of father. A role he first idealized in the Trinity killer. Throughout the season, he grew less attached to Dexter the killer and more to the family man. There was a light at the end of the tunnel. By killing Rita, it completely dashes all of that. The season was building him up just to destroy all he had built.

Now the speculation about the next season begins. First of all, I think the writers, looking back at it, had to kill his suburban life. I don't think we could have gone through another season trapped in suburbia with a happy Dexter. Second, this gives the writers a great opportunity to go back to a dark Dexter who nexts to control his urges. As Michael C. Hall alluded to after the finale, Dexter might be even darker than past seasons, seeking revenge instead of justice. There is the additional question of what happens to the rest of the family and his son. Additionally, I think there is the opportunity to start the next season right were the last one left off. I can see them investigating Dexter for Rita's murder. Dexter has no alibi for when she was killed (he was killing Trinity). She was killed is a specific manner, which Dexter the blood analyst knew about. Masuka saw Rita cheat on Dexter. Quinn saw Dexter clearly upset. I don't know if they go this route, but I can see a clearly frustrated Dexter early next season. He feels the urge to kill because of Rita, but can't because of the eyes watching him because of Rita's death. I just hope my expectations aren't too high.

Bears: Season Awards

So I'm back from a longer than expected hiatus. And I will try to keep up better, but I've been busy/lazy lately. Anyway, I'll be talking about other things than Bears in the future, but I thought I'd at least conclude my season long series.

Well at least the season ended on a good note. Wins against 2 division opponents is never bad. Now we wait to see who our coordinators are going to be. The Bears kind of took the same approach as the Illini, give the head coach 1 more season to prove himself and fire the coordinators. Either way its looking like Lovie must make the playoffs to keep his job. As far as personnel, I would start with both lines. The offensive line needs to improve. I really don't have any answers, but we can't have a non-existent running game and Cutler getting knocked around every other play. The D-line needs to provide better pressure on the QB. The Bears finished just over average with 35 sacks. Other needs would be a safety to solidify at least one safety position and a solid, experience receiver to help make the Cutler-receiver connection more stable.

Offensive MVP: Greg Olsen. This is a very reluctant pick. I don't really think there was an MVP, but if I have to pick I'll go with Olsen who led the team with 8 TD receptions. He also had 60 receptions for 612 yards. He still needs to make some plays on balls thrown his way. Olsen kind of wins this by default. You cannot pick Cutler with all the picks he had. The O-line as a unit was dreadful early in the season. They improved in the latter half of the season with Chris Williams having a particularly good game against Jared Allen and the Vikings. Forte improved with the O-line and as Kahil Bell appeared. The receiving corp didn't have consistent play or receptions which hurt them. Hester was injured. Knox started out hot, but still made rookie mistakes. Bennett is probably the runner-up. I can't recall him dropping too many balls and has played well, but often disappeared in games (not that it's his fault).

Defensive MVP: Lance Briggs. This was an easy one. The Bears only Pro Bowler, who is not playing in the Pro Bowl, led the team with 93 tackles. Briggs was the most consistent player and is also fairly easily the Bears overall MVP. To think there was a time where he was almost certainly going to be an ex-Bear. Runners-up include Tillman and Hillenmeyer who filled in adequately for Urlacher. Tillman was the Bears best corner and played through injuries all season.

Special Teams MVP: Robbie Gould. This also was a fairly easy pick. Besides a notable miss in the 2nd Minnesota game, Gould was pretty much automatic making 24 of 28 kicks and hitting every extra point. Brad Maynard had a decent season as well averaging 41.4 yards per punt. Kick coverage was good, but too often seemed to give up a big return. Kick and Punt returns were fairly good with a cast of Hester, Bennett, Knox, and Danieal Manning providing good returns.

Rookie of the Year: Johnny Knox. No doubt here Johnny Knox had 45 receptions for 527 yards and 5 TDs. He also returned 32 kicks for an average of 29 yards and 1 TD. Al Afalava gets an honorable mention for starting at safety and learning as the season progressed.

Most Improved Player throughout this Season: Chris Williams. As I mentioned before Williams had a very good game in Minnesota and began to get settled once he moved to left tackle. He played a lot better compared to how he and the rest of the line looked in the beginning of the season. Honorable mention to Zack Bowman who seemed more confident as the season progressed. Again compare the first Lions game where he was torched by Calvin Johnson to the 2nd game where Johnson still played well, 86 yards and 1 TD, but was not as big of a factor.

Bears: Is it over yet?

I watched the season finales of Californication and Dexter last week (I still want to do a Dexter review) and as much as I didn't want those shows to end, I want the Bears season to end soon. It is very apparent that this team is mostly moving backwards. I just want it to end before too much damage is done. Sunday's game was one of the most painful to watch. There were some good signs. The running game continues to improve which is an extremely good trend. The Bears were also able to contain Ray Rice after the initial bursts. I guess the player I've seen regress most is Cutler. Early on his passes were lightning quick and the interceptions were often half the receivers fault or a tip ball. But recently his passes have been short not on target or intercepted. I hope that off-season workouts with the receivers can improve that. Cutler's troubles are worrisome because this is the player that will most likely outlast the current coaches and GM. With all the speculation and talk about the safety of certain jobs, it is very apparent that everybody is focusing on the next season, which is the same I am doing. I can't wait to see what happens to Hank Moody and Dexter Morgan. As for the Bears, I'll watch with cautious pessimism.

Bears: Again

Well I really want to talk about the Dexter finale (which was much more interesting than the Bears game), but I'll stick to the Monday Morning (or in this case afternoon) Quarterbacking. Well I could probably rip the script from a few of my other posts: Bears down early, make a comeback, lose the lead, failed two minute drill, game. I don't want to sound like a broken record, but once again the Bears were a two minute drill away from at least a tie. I'll also clarify that this doesn't make the Bears a good team, but points to the fact that the parity exists and no team is unbeatable any game. This game was a little different, at least it had a little different feel. Maybe that's just want happens when the Bears and Packers meet for their biannual meeting that only means something to one of the teams.

• Running. I actually thought Forte and the run game looked decent this game Forte only got 51 yards, but averaged 4.3 a carry. It's been slightly under the radar, but the run game has gotten better even if underused.
• Penalties. Killer. Too many line penalties. 13 for 109 yards. Yikes.
• Challenge. One of the worst coaching decisions I've seen. Using two timeouts (one timeout and 1 challenge) and not effectively using either. If you were going to challenge, should've just thrown the flag to begin with and if you had a timeout to watch it you should have gotten it right. Although I thought the challenge could have gone either way.
• Defense. The Defense played well after a few lapses early on. There some definite bend not break moments, but for the most part the D played well.
• The Cutler Connection. Killer again. Turnovers and penalties killed the Bears. Those under throws were deadly. This is actually the 1st game where I clearly saw what practically everyone else has been saying about the weak receiving corp. If Cutler had more trust and more experienced receivers would he have 20+ interceptions, probably not. I still think its not a offseason priority. I think you allow the receivers to grow into that role.

Bulls

I've avoided talking about the Bulls so far this season. I wish I would have wrote something sooner because early on I was about to write a glowing review. How things change after the circus trip. To briefly summarize the season, the Bulls started out well with big victories against the Spurs and Cavs in Cleveland. Things were looking up before the road trip out west. The Bulls had a sputtering offense but a much improved defense. Ben Gordon gone = sputtering offense and better defense. The world made sense. Luol and Noah also looked to be much improved with Rose struggling early on.

The Circus trip even started out well with a victory over the Kings who had had a 4 game winning streak. Then, the Bulls played the Lakers, Blazers, and Nuggets and have never looked the same. I don't think anyone was surprised that they lost those 3. Without Tyrus, the Bulls were forced into a short lineup depthwise and heightwise. However ever since then, the early season strong defensive effort has disappeared. Kirk Hinrich missed games, which probably hurt the defensive effort. But recent blowout losses and a loss to the at the time 1-18 Nets, have me yearning for the Skiles days. At least in those days the team seemed to be more than the sum of their parts. There was a good effort every game. So I'll try and breakdown the ups and downs thus far.

• Ups. Taj Gibson looks like a veteran. He played 4 years in college and it shows. I don't remember the last time I saw a rookie as composed as he is. He plays with a lot of energy and under control. He also has a nice mid-range jumper. Derrick Rose has bounced back from a slow start with a bad ankle to look impressive in recent games. Noah and Deng look like they can be locks for a double double nearly every game. Deng has bulked up and is a stronger presence when battling for rebounds.
• Downs. Well, I'll be brief since there's a lot. I agree with Stacy King, they need to reduce the screen roll and let Rose navigate the floor free of other players. Also, we need a more complicated offense. If I were an opponent, they basically have to be ready for the high screen roll and thats about it. The high screen roll doesn't work when the do a hard show on Rose and Noah gets the ball 17 feet from the basket. Salmons needs to go harder to the hoop. I like it when he drives, but he often fades away from contact which he needs to go after to get some foul calls. James Johnson looks very raw. I hope someday he looks smoother. But it looks like he is forcing things on offense and lost on defense. Pargo looks like Ben Gordon lite and has been forced to play longer with Hinrich out. I think the plan was use him as a spark off the bench. While he has done that in some games, he seems more like a defense liability.
• The Worst. It seems that the team suffers from a lack of concentration and effort often. It seems that the other team just wants it more. I've already seen in the Nets game some of the players playing for themselves and attempting to make their own shot instead of find something through the offense. I saw Johnson, Deng, Salmons, and Noah all do this. Nothing speaks to this whole situation more than the Bulls final possession against the Nets. The Bulls were unable to inbound to Rose so Salmons got it. Salmons made a move and launched a 3 point shot with 7 seconds left when we were down 1 point. While its already bad that the Bulls couldn't get it to Rose, Salmons made it worse by throwing up the 3 with 7 seconds left. Down 1 point he could have tried to draw a foul or taken more time to find something. 7 seconds is a lot of time.

Bears: Better than 1-10

What can you say after a victory like that? Well we're better than the worst. Let's face it losing yesterday's game would have been a disaster and made this a disastrous season. Right now were at a disappointing season. The game overall reminded me of the last Bulls win (1-7 since the Sacramento win) against the very depleted Pistons (no Rip, Prince, Villanueva, and an hobbled Gordon). In the game, the Bulls were clearly the better team, but could not break free of the Pistons. Even when the Pistons came close you never really thought they would win it. I had the same feeling yesterday. Even when the Rams could have tied it at the end, I never really felt that they would.

• Give the D credit. The defense had a solid game yesterday only allowing 9 points and playing most of the game with the Rams having a short field. Jamar Williams was a monster with 18 tackles and the Bears were able to create pressure on Boller. On the other hand, the Rams have the lowest scoring offense in the NFL. It's nice to see a team with more problems than ours. There offense would have looked completely inept without Steven Jackson.
• We are a running Team? The difference yesterday was a conservative game plan with the 38 rushes and 18 passes. Forte had 24 carries and Bell had 11. The game plan looked similar to year's past: let the defense win the game and score just enough points on offense to squeak by. I think the emergence of Bell is good, because Forte seems to be running harder. Maybe a little competition from behind provided a little fire. What Forte seems to be missing this year is that little spurt from the crowd. What I mean is those plays where he would spurt through a gap and stumble a head for 3 to 5 more yards. This year he has looked more hesitant and running into a brick wall on most plays.
• Please no more wide receiver screen. Please. Another disappointment was not seeing Aromashodu do too when he received significant time. It would have been nice to see more of what he can do. All I remember is a dropped screen pass and a pass catch out of bounds. Also, I noticed a lot more writers wanting the Bears to test out young backups like Gaines Adams, Jarron Gilbert, and DJ Moore.
• Special Teams. The special teams played uncharacteristically bad allowing Amendola too many good returns. Punt returns were an adventure after Hester left. There was the timeout before a Maynard punt when there were too few men on the field. There was also the unsuccessful fake FG. To be clear though, I thought the fake was a good idea. Why not mix things up? It's not like the season is on the line anymore. I'm not sure of Olsen would have made it anyways, but it was good recognition by the defender.

Stargate Universe

Stargate Universe is the 3rd TV series based on the 1994 movie Stargate. I was a fan of the original show Stargate SG-1 because the story initial interested me, but it kind of lost me in the later episodes. For those of you who have never seen the movie or the original series, the movie's premise is that an archaeological dig in Egypt found an artifact which turns out to be a "stargate" a gateway to another world. A military team is sent through the gate and finds that the ancient rebelled against an alien being posing as the Egyptian god Ra.

The series SG-1 built upon that concept by introducing the possibilty of an infinite amount of gates to other worlds with other Goa'uld (the alien race posing as gods). A rivalry was set up between the Goa'uld and Earth. The show evolved to include other threats I also thought the show was too formulaic, one world one show. Everything seemed neatly cleaned up every episode. Additionally, the SG-1 and the whole operation seemed too idealistic. They would do things that were ethically the best without considering the inherent danger in the situation. I'm pretty sure earth should have been destroyed many, many times.

I started watching Stargate Universe just because it peaked my interest. I didn't watch Stargate Atlantis because I premiered when I was still turned off by many of the later plot lines. The premise of the show is that the Ancients, the builders of the stargate system, have a ship named "Destiny" to explore gates that had been deployed by another ship. In the first episode, Stargate personnel come under attack during an gate experiment. The personnel flee through the gate to "Destiny". Destiny at this point is millions of years old and millions of light years away from Earth. Much of the early show involved surviving on the ship. If your thinking of a comparison, its kind of a combination of Lost and Stargate.

The cast is an ensemble with many characters, but a group of regulars. Interesting developments include:

• A power struggle and distrust between Dr. Rush (Robert Carlyle) and Col. Young (Justin Louis),
• A power/personal dispute between Col. Young and Col. Telford (Lou Diamond Phillips)
• The social and psychological aspect of trying to survive.
• The opening of new sections of Destiny.
• The grumblings of the lower level crew who wonder about the decisions of leadership.

The Good.

• I'm fairly exciting about this show because it is a good concept and there is plenty of space for this show to grow. The communication stones, which link them to Earth, are a good idea and allow us to return to Earth as viewers so that we are reminded of more familiar settings. The amount of unknown passengers on Destiny also allow the writers to easily introduce new characters.
• I like that, at least early into the series, plot lines seem to be running through the season rather than only through episodes.
• Also it is nice to see significant conflict between the main characters which builds better natural drama in leiu of action in which drama is often forced.
• I especially like that this show seemed to better explore the darker side of human behavior and our weaknesses.
• I liked the idea that a disease is infecting everybody. The episode gave a weak out, but it is something that really bothered me about SG-1. You'd think that diseases from foreign planets would be a major problem. Just think about when Europeans came over to North America, the Native Americans mostly died of diseases.

Weaknesses.

• They seem to be falling into the trap of one planet, one episode a few times. There's nothing wrong with it, I just hope they don't get lazy and continue to do it.
• As I mentioned before, there seem to be a few weak outs so far. Don't get me wrong characters have been killed off, but it would be nicer to see things just magically get better.
• With many characters, it is easy to forget some and focus to strongly on others giving away the rest of the show. If the story is spread too thin, its hard to truly develop any of the characters.
• The show has lost the humor of the original SG-1 series. Eli (David Blue) is inserted for humor and balance, but it would be nice to see some humor from the other characters who generally seem depressed.
• The logistics seem to be mostly taken care of but... (1)Those clothes have got to be getting old, (2) why is there multiple rooms and life support facilities on an abandoned ship, (3) is there really a bathroom with toliet paper and stuff like toothbrushes and combs. I know that it is TV but some of the actors looked too well put together.

Overall, this is a step towards Stargate being a legitimate drama. The show has some depth and but has not really fully explored it thus far. The show seems to be what is on the surface, but is still in the development of characters and conflicts. However, the premise of the show gives the writers endless directions and conflicts to explore and has tremendous potential.

Bears: Not much to say

There's not much to say after a game like that. The game pretty much went as expected. I thought it could have been a lot worse. The Vikings just more pulled away rather than sprinted ahead like the Cardinal and Bengal games. I struggle to watch the game flipping to Cinderella Man during commercials. Maybe I'm just hoping that this one time former playoff contender can resurrect itself at some point, well not this season.

• Stopping the Run. For the most part the Bears stopped AP. He went for 85 yards on 25 carries for an average of 3.4 yards, 1 TD and 2 Fumbles. That's actually, the same average as Forte. On the other hand we traded that for Brett Favre going 32 of 48 for 392 yards and 3 TDs. But the main goal this week was to stop AP and it appears for the most part he was and that's gotta count for something right?
• 3rd Down. 3rd Down was a killer though. The Vikings converted 12 out of 18 3rd downs. It seemed whenever they needed it Favre always found one of his receivers to convert. For the most part the Bears played well on 1st and 2nd downs but had trouble on 3rd down.
• Offense. The offense seemed like a non-factor. In fact, I'm struggling to remember an offensive play in the 2nd half. The Bears went for -3 offensive yard in the 2nd half. Definitely a forgettable half.

Rerun

I wish I was talking about Rerun from What's Happening!!. I'm wondering if I should have been watching The Departed or Goodfellas, excellent Scorsese films that were on Sunday night. Don't get me wrong, I love watching the Bears even in defeat. However I feel like I've seen this game before, just. Follow me if you will through Goodfellas and 4 of the Bears losses (GB, ATL, SF, PHI) this season. The Bears open poorly get beat on both sides of the ball. Henry gets a job at the Cab stand misses school and gets beat by his dad. The Bears put together a few long drives to get back in the game. Scorsese uses a couple long shots to introduce you to Henry's adult mob life, the most famous of which goes through the Copacabana. The Bears momentum fades and the Bears do what they can to stay alive. Cutler does his best Joe Pesci impression unleashing a tantrum as NBC goes to break. Henry gets sent to jail starts to deal drugs to get through it. The Bears' opponents take back the lead late. Henry starts seeing helicopters and gets arrest for dealing drugs. Cutler frantically leads the Bears on a 2 minute drill but flushes the Bears hopes down the drain when he gets intercepted. Henry frantically gets home to get the drugs he left before he was arrested but finds that Karen has flushed the drugs down the toilet. The Bears lose another close one and will now probably watch the post-season on tv like schmucks like everyone else. Henry enters the witness protection program and now lives like a schmuck like everyone else.

Cutler. This was actually the first game since Green Bay I thought Jay was off. In other high turnover games, I thought Cutler's interceptions were more a product of unfortunate circumstances and the reality of playing 3 TDs down. I felt Cutler kind of lost his edge. He wasn't forcing many balls, as a result many of the passes were Orton dump downs. He also missed on balls to open Olson, Hester, and Knox.

Red Zone. The key to this season is probably in the Red Zone. With better play in the red zone, the Bears, probably defeat the Falcons, Packers, Niners, and Eagles. Twice the Bears were in the red zone in the first half and only came out with a field goal.

Defense. I thought the defense played reasonably well. Its not the defense that wouldn't allow more than 20 points, but its also not the same defense that we saw against the Bengals and the Cards. You can tell the Bears miss that inside stabilizing force of Brown and Urlacher. I thought that Alex Brown and Marcus Harrison showed great recognition, complete blowing up a couple screen passes. Charles Tillman showed why he is the best at causing fumbles. I'm actually going to name it a Tillman any time a corner causes a fumble on a slant route just after the ball is caught. It also appears that Bowman can grow into his role. I think they just need to stop switching the DBs positions and start to develop some players in one role.

Turner. I've defended Turner in the past, because you can't always blame the coordinator for the miscues of the players. However, I thought there were a few instances were I would have called things differently. First of, after the success of the screen pass last week, why didn't he call a screen pass to Forte until 11 mins left in the 4th quarter. Second, that wide receiver screen has got to go, especially on long yardage situations. Third, a straight run play up the gut on 1st and 20?

At the end of the day... One of my favorite overused expressions in sports, but at the end of the day this loss likely ends whatever was left of the Bears season. So why play? To show improvement. I doesn't even matter in draft position because we don't have 1st or 2nd round picks. If I was Lovie, I'd say just go out and have fun. There's no pressure to make the playoffs because its so unlikely that it will happen. Just play free, get some hits, and score some TDs.

Improvement

So the narrative that began in the 2nd quarter and has continued in the 3rd quarter of the season is what is going to happen next year. I was mostly on board with that narrative after last week's lost to San Francisco. That is, until I saw that the Bears at 4-5 still have a chance at the playoffs with the Wild Card leaders only at 5-4. There are 5 teams between the Bears and a spot. I still think this team will not make it, but its something to think about.

I also think there were some encouraging signs from Thursday's game, of course anything would mostly be encouraging after the Cardinal's game. But I'll start with the bad.

• The Bad. Penalties and Turnovers absolute killed the Bears. Offensive mistakes lost a very winnable game. The Bears finished with 10 penalties for 75 yards along with 5 interceptions. Many of the holding, false start, and unsportsmanlike conduct are mental errors and should be fixable. I'm going to blame half (2.5) of the interceptions on Cutler. The interceptions at the goal line were dumb and the interception where the ref got in the way he probably should have seen. Hester falling on the turf and the DB knocking down Kellen Davis are ones I'm not going to blame him for.
• The Good. The defense after the Cardinals disaster played well only giving up 10 points and 216 yards. The D-line looked a lot better, I'm particularly remembering a Tommie Harris run stop behind the line and a number of times Alex Smith was under pressure.
• The Encouraging. Despite the turnover problems, the offense was still able to move the ball with 350 total yards. The offensive line seems to be giving Cutler a little more time and those screen plays to Forte have looked great. Might there be a link between those two? I've already said that the defense looked better last week and the special teams have been pretty solid, save for a couple awful looking returns.

Looking ahead this week's Sunday night game is looking pivotal if the Bears want to sneak into the playoffs. The Eagles along with the Packers (who we play in Week 14) are both ahead of us in the wild card. I know it's been looking gloomy but if somehow this team puts together a solid game (with both offense and defense playing decently) against the Eagles, we would be a step closer to NFL relevance.

Well that was horrible

Last week I said that this team was middling and that it would have to prove itself over the course of the next 4 weeks or so. Well I hope that wasn't our answer. Halfway through the season and we are right where we started, record-wise. Perception-wise we have been through a half season of football if you just compare the questions this team faced 9 weeks ago. Heck, just a few weeks ago the questions centered around getting Cutler more time to and Forte more space to run. Now the defense has collapsed against two opponents. I mean utterly collapsed. You can't get much worse than 0 defensive stops in the 1st half. There's just no way our offense can keep pace with that. There's a whole lot of negatives out there, so lets look at the silver lining.

• O-line looked decent. The offense line actually looked okay giving Jay a reasonable amount of time to pass. I don't know how much of that was due to Arizona being up by 20 points or what, but in the pass we couldn't even defend against a 4 man rush.
• The D played better in the 2nd half. Again, I don't know how much that had to do with the offense Arizona was running, but they couldn't stop anything in the first half. For that mini-comeback stretch, our D actually look like it should.

I'd say the most depressing thing about the past few weeks, the thing that's affected this team's fans the most, is the entertainment value of these games. This game and the Cincinnati game were horrible to watch for obvious reasons and the Browns game was equally as boring as it was frustrating. At least the 1st quarter of the season featured some action and exciting finishes.

Review: Dexter

I've been looking to add a review post each week, but up to now have been unable to (thanks Veto Session). For my first review, I'll look at Dexter which I only recently started watching. Dexter is probably, other than 30 Rock, the show I most look forward to. For those of you who have never seen Dexter, Dexter is a serial killer who works for Miami Metro and kills killers who have gotten away. The series in its 4th season I believe. This season is premised by the question: Can Dexter continue his ways while being married with kids? To assist in this question this year's serial killer counterpart is the Trinity Killer, who has successfully killed without being caught for 30 years. The standard spoiler alert applies.

• Who? Since I started watching, the main question I have is who is going to find out who Dexter really is? So far everyone who has learned his identity is dead. But he has stuck to the code and never killed a non-killer who has learned his identity. My theory is that this season will be different. I think Deb will find out who Dexter is. She already is investigating Harry's (Dexter's father) former informants (and lovers which include Dexter's real mom). She knows that somebody took Lundy's stuff after he was killed. She is also starting to deteriorate after Lundy's death. I don't know what Dexter will do if she finds out, but the Trinity killer reenacts his family's deaths and I wonder if the same theme will play in Dexter.
• The Code. Another theme throughout the series is how closely Dexter follows Harry's Code. Everytime Dexter has deviated from the code he has learned to regret it. But he we are again, Harry is warning Dexter about juggling his family, his job, and his obsession, but Dexter thinks he can control all three. It will be interesting to see if Dexter or Harry is right.
• Secrets. I read in a review somewhere that Dexter is really not about killing, but about secrets. I buy that Dexter is about keeping secrets and how to hide a dark side. Harry has said about the Code, that it will keep him alive. Dexter isn't killing as some morality play. He is killing in order to control his urges and following the code to insure that he can survive. Part of that survival is keeping his secret.
• Why I Enjoy. The storyline is the backbone of what makes this series enjoyable. It presses on in each episode and makes you look forward to the next episode and the conclusion of the season. Overall, it makes me wonder how all of these side plots will converge in the conclusion. Another interesting aspect throughout the series has been the duality in Dexter between his public persona and his blood hungry inner self. The show relates that relationship to how everyone puts on a different face in public, because Dexter puts on a show for everyone else. Only his victims know Dexter for what he really is. I think they are touching on that a bit this year with Dexter's problems with Rita and how she feels he is being disingenuous. I also like how the show makes you understand Dexter. Part of the reason the show did not seem attractive to me at first was that I didn't think that I could feel sympathy and watch a serial killer. I felt it would be a dark CSI. Dexter in the show is really guy with normal problems that are complicated with an obsession to kill.
• Negatives. I few things irritate me about the show. The music, while usually great sometimes gets in the way, especially when they play Dexter's theme. I've just heard that song too many times. The Trinity Killer. Did Lundy really never notice that the Trinity Killer always kills mothers and fathers with two kids? I made the connection that it was a family of four 2 or 3 episodes before Dexter? Was that really a big revelation? I am also always a bit aggravated that things always work out for Dexter. They don't always at first, but they do in the end. At the end of the 2nd season, Doakes found out who Dexter was and Dexter had a problem, he couldn't kill Doakes because it didn't fit with the Code. But he got lucky and Lila did it for him and Doakes was framed as the Bay City butcher. Also, Dexter left blood at the scene where George King was killed, but they never found it. He also has found a reason to kill everyone who has found out.

Overall, Dexter is a great show. For a while I believed that you watch comedies on TV and dramas on the big screen, but Dexter has changed my thoughts on that. It is a series that you'll watch and talk about the next day.